Topic on User talk:Ilovemydoodle2/Flow

Please don't create unneeded templates on this wiki and use them to be disruptive on long term users talk pages.

Disruptive edits on this wiki, can, and may, result in either short term or long term blocks from editing and participating on this wiki.

Sorry! New to 'StructuredDiscussions'. – Ilovemydoodle2 (talk) 21:25, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

I've indefinitely blocked your account for the reasons given at Topic:X0ajzz2ol0tf777k, in short since you seem to be here primarily to export Wikiquote disputes to MediaWiki.org rather than to contribute constructively.

@Pppery: I understand some of the reasons listed there, but I don't understand "Extended arguing". Could explain further? – Ilovemydoodle2 (talk) 19:29, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

In short, you bludgeoned the process at Topic:Wzrj1gkuzc9iqmd6. That, by itself, wasn't enough to justify a block, but combined with your other edits, was enough to push me over the line. Several of your other posts, such as Topic:X00qjpkjtv6reidf and User talk:Malyacko#July 2022 seem to likewise be arguing for the sake of doing so and not legitimate discussion.

Also, please take into account my constructive contributions to phabricator, which cannot be used if you are blocked here. – Ilovemydoodle2 (talk) 19:49, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

I don't think being blocked on MediaWiki.org has any effect on Phabricator, and in any case I wouldn't call your Phabricator contributions constructive.

When attempting to login to phabricator, it results in an error.

Well, I later realized that forcing someone else to write code for me on something that got rejected was probably a bad idea, so I decided to it myself instead. But, I shouldn't of done that in the first place, and should've closed it. I started topic:Wzrj1gkuzc9iqmd6 so I could do it myself, rather than forcing someone else to do it. – Ilovemydoodle2 (talk) 19:38, 30 July 2022 (UTC)