Wikimedia Release Engineering Team/Deployment pipeline/20170725-planning
Appearance
2017-07-25
[edit]Existing meetings
- Weekly tactical - (all meeting notes: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Release_Engineering_Team/Deployment_pipeline )
- Monthly Mark/Kevin (hopefully can be replaced by this one)
- Phabricator task hierarchy: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T170453This meeting will be monthly
Purpose of this meeting: Longer term. What is needed during the upcoming month.Â
Team-by-team status
[edit]Ops
[edit]- WIthin last couple quarters
- Fixed Puppetization
- Created production clusters
- Created staging cluster
- Worked a bit on base images and how to manage docker security updates in production (ideas)
- This quarter
- Kubernetes: Try to upgrade to 1.7; trying to keep 2 clusters in sync
- Alex working on network isolation and pods
- Try to define standard structure (container plus helper containers)
- Current/upcoming dependencies
- Not at the moment. Will work with cloud on Kubernetes upgrade.Â
- Will want feedback after the plan is written
Services
[edit]- Created basic minikube test cluster: https://github.com/wikimedia/mediawiki-containers/blob/master/README.k8s.md
- Started work on `mwctl` utility to manage edit -> test workflow: https://github.com/wikimedia/mwctl
- Design notes at https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Z1nPkWea-YtWoYAvHVK8SNoD7gM8yRGf_VbiRkWalsw/edit#
- RFC on container structure standards: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T169998
- Marko working on documenting use cases
- Next step: Make it a product
- mwctl tool: allow you to test and develop code in minikube environment
- RFC - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T169998 (see also above)
- Status of RFC: Parts don't matter, but waiting on us (in this call) to agree on them
- mwctl relies on conventions. So ideally resolve the RFC "soon" (the sooner the better)
- Blocked/dependencies
- Document use cases (Marko will write and circulate)
Release Engineering
[edit]- Worked on abstraction to generate images for various stages of pipeline (dev/staging/prod)
- https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/source/blubber/
- review of acl for jenkins for a where to build these containers for pushing into staging pipeline
- https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T169557 (could use more review)
- Dan starting review of deployment/k8s packaging stuff with helm -- to sync up with services work
- relates to mwctl work
- Dependencies
- acl is the big thing (we have discussed at weekly meetings)
- Need a bit more sync-up with ops about orchestration tools (e.g. helm)...will be blocked early next quarter
Next month, this meeting should start to think about Q2 goals for the program
Program status
[edit]https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Foundation_Annual_Plan/2017-2018/Final/Programs/Technology#Program_6._Streamlined_service_delivery Outcomes, Objectives, and Milestones Outcome 1: We have seamless productization and operation of (micro)services.
- Objective 1: Set up production-ready Kubernetes cluster(s) with adequate capacity
- Done (can expand capcity as needed with budget)
- Objective 2: Create a standardized application environment for running applications in Kubernetes
- Working on it this quarter (and next)
Outcome 2: Developers are able to develop and test their applications through a unified pipeline towards production deployment.
- Objective 1: Create guidelines and abstractions for building and testing applications in containers
- Work ongoing by Ops (but not tied to a quarterly goal)
- Objective 2: Set up a continuous integration and deployment pipeline to publish new versions of an application to production via testing and staging environments that reliably reproduce production
- Quarterly goal by RelEng
- Includes Blubber
- Define functional tests for Mathoid running on the staging Kubernetes cluster for use in future gating decisions - task T170482
- Define method for monitoring and reacting to the above functional tests - task T170483
- Objective 3: Provide a lightweight integrated development environment that lets developers test their code against a local miniature copy of the production stack
- Work ongoing by Services; prototype ready. (but not tied to a quarterly goal)
Discussion about work tracking in phab
[edit]- Work should be tracked to programs/outcomes/objectives/q-goals
- Seems most useful to tie to objectives
- ACTION: Everyone (teams) draft goals for Q2 by next meeting
- ACTION: Mark will try to figure out a single way for all work within this program to track work