Wikimedia Product/Inclusive Product Development/annotated bibliography
Introduction
[edit]The purpose of this document is to help the Inclusive Product Development working group aggregate and summarize its collective knowledge to make it easier for us to build a common foundation, and leverage the knowledge of others. The list is not exhaustive and we are open to recommendations of works to read. Much of what is below is external work. A resource library of internal research and movement publications is currently being curated and the link to that library will be available on the main Inclusive Product Development page. In the interim, the supplementary materials on the draft playbook page best represents the internal documentation teams are being encouraged to reference as they pursue this work.
Structure
[edit]This annotated bibliography is organized in three parts:
- a table of contents by theme
- an alphabetical review of the most relevant or influential articles, papers and book chapters
- and a list of further reading.
Each entry includes full reference details; categorization by theme and type; a set of keywords; a summary of the principal findings and how they connect to the research question; and in most cases, cross-references to relevant reviewed items, and suggested additional reading.
Items that have a digital copy in the repository are noted in each entry or marked by an asterisk [*].
Links to the works below
[edit]- Race After Technology- Link
- Gender and Technology- Link
- Openness, inclusion and self-affirmation: Indigenous knowledge in open knowledge projects- Link
- Dimensions of Diversity- Link
- Data Feminism- Link
- European Union Gender Equality Index- Link
- Situated knowledges: The Science question in feminism and privilege of partial perspective- Link
- Building for Everyone- Link
Race After Technology
[edit]Citation | |
Full Reference | Benjamin, Ruha, Race After Technology: Abolitionist Tools for the New Jim Code, Polity Press 2019 |
Type | Book, Audio Book, Podcast interview |
Theme | Ethical Product Development |
Keywords | Power, Knowledge, |
In Repository? | Yes, MN has hardcopy, available also on Audible |
Summary | “In this book, Benjamin explores the myriad of ways in which technology reinforces systemic oppression in America, creating a digital dragnet which codes people by stigmatizing them for where they live, work, and play.” (Social Forces, Volume 98, Issue 4, June 2020)
|
Cross-Ref | xxx |
See Also
|
Ethics & Race in Tech, San Francisco City Arts & Lectures, June 2020
|
Summary by | MNovotny |
Gender and Technology
[edit]Citation |
Gender and Technology[edit] |
Full Reference | Bray, Francesca, Gender and Technology, Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 2007 |
Type | Journal article |
Theme | Feminist Technology Studies |
Keywords | Gender, Feminism, Technology, Anthropology |
In Repository? | MIT |
Summary | The praxis-oriented interdisciplinary field of feminist technology studies (FTS) has done most among the social sciences to build a vibrant and coherent school of gender and technology studies. Given their shared commitment to exploring emergent forms of power in the contemporary world, there is surprisingly little dialogue between FTS and mainstream cultural anthropology. This review begins by outlining FTS and its concepts and methods |
Cross-Ref | xxx |
See Also
|
https://geekfeminism.wikia.org/wiki/Category:Resources
|
Summary by | Selene Yang |
Openness, inclusion and self-affirmation: Indigenous knowledge in open knowledge projects
[edit]Citation |
Openness, inclusion and self-affirmation: Indigenous knowledge in open knowledge projects[edit] |
Full Reference | Nathalie Casemajor, Christian Coocoo, and Karine Gentelet: Openness, inclusion and self-affirmation: Indigenous knowledge in open knowledge projects. The Journal of Peer Production, |
Type | paper |
Theme | Inclusion |
Keywords | xxx |
In Repository? | xxx |
Summary | What are the most important takeaways for this group? |
Cross-Ref | xxx |
See Also
|
Xxx
|
Summary by | Your name here |
Dimensions of Diversity
[edit]Citation |
Dimensions of Diversity[edit] |
Full Reference | University of Washington, https://www.tacoma.uw.edu/equity/dimensions-diversity#:~:text=At%20the%20heart%20of%20the,Class%2C%20Disability%2C%20and%20Nationality. |
Type | Webpage |
Theme | Dimensions of Diversity |
|
Age, Gender, Religion, Sexual Orientation, Race, Ethnicity, Class, Disability, Nationality |
In Repository? | xxx |
Summary | On this webpage they break out 9 dimensions of diversity: Age, Gender, Religion, Sexual Orientation, Race, Ethnicity, Class, Disability, Nationality.
|
Cross-Ref | xxx |
See Also
|
xxx
|
Summary by | Carol Dunn |
Data feminism
[edit]Citation |
Data feminism[edit] |
Full Reference | D'Ignazio, Catherine & Klein, Lauren (2020). https://data-feminism.mitpress.mit.edu/ |
Type | Webpage |
Theme | Technology and data science from a feminist perspective |
Keywords | Data, feminism, power, technology, intersectionality |
In Repository? | xxx |
Summary | 1. The Power Chapter
Principle #1 of Data Feminism is to Examine Power. Data feminism begins by analyzing how power operates in the world.
Principle #2 of Data Feminism is to Challenge Power. Data feminism commits to challenging unequal power structures and working toward justice.
Principle #3 of Data Feminism is to Elevate Emotion and Embodiment. Data feminism teaches us to value multiple forms of knowledge, including the knowledge that comes from people as living, feeling bodies in the world.
Principle #4 of Data Feminism is to Rethink Binaries and Hierarchies. Data feminism requires us to challenge the gender binary, along with other systems of counting and classification that perpetuate oppression.
Principle #5 of Data Feminism is to Embrace Pluralism. Data feminism insists that the most complete knowledge comes from synthesizing multiple perspectives, with priority given to local, Indigenous, and experiential ways of knowing.
Principle #6 of Data Feminism is to Consider Context. Data feminism asserts that data are not neutral or objective. They are the products of unequal social relations, and this context is essential for conducting accurate, ethical analysis.
Principle #7 of Data Feminism is to Make Labor Visible. The work of data science, like all work in the world, is the work of many hands. Data feminism makes this labor visible so that it can be recognized and valued. |
Cross-Ref | xxx |
See Also
|
Seven intersectional feminist principles for equitable and actionable COVID-19 data - Catherine D'Ignazio, Lauren F. Klein, 2020
|
Summary by | Selene Yang |
Gender Equality Index
[edit]Citation |
Gender Equality Index[edit] |
Full Reference | https://eige.europa.eu/gender-equality-index/2019/BE |
Type | Webpage, EU gender equality index |
Theme | Gender Equality |
Keywords | Gender Equality, Index |
In Repository? | xxx |
Summary | On this webpage you can see a “Gender Equality Index Score” for different countries in the European Union. You can drill down to each country and you can drill down to each component that adds up to the index score. “Knowledge” is one of the intersecting domains that feed into the index. |
Cross-Ref | xxx |
See Also
|
xxx
|
Summary by | Carol Dunn |
Situated knowledges: The Science question in feminism and privilege of partial perspective
[edit]Citation |
Situated knowledges: The Science question in feminism and privilege of partial perspective[edit] |
Full Reference | Haraway, Donna. (1988) https://msu.edu/~kg/874/Haraway_1988__Situated_Knowledges.pdf |
Type | Webpage, PDF |
Theme | Feminism in academia. What are the relevant questions one needs to ask themselves when creating knowledge. |
Keywords | Feminism, Situated Knowledge, Cyborg, Privilege, Feminist epistemology |
In Repository? | xxx |
Summary | Donna Haraway’s perspective on situated knowledge around science and epistemology. |
Cross-Ref | xxx |
See Also
|
A manifesto for cyborgs. |
Summary by | Selene Yang |
Jean-Baptiste, Annie
[edit]Citation |
Jean-Baptiste, Annie 2020[edit] |
Full Reference | https://www.instagram.com/tv/CCrEpViJwWI/?igshid=1fo5uvhdk1ojx |
Type | Video interview |
Theme | How Ms Jean-Baptiste leads inclusive product development at Google. She is interviewed in the Black Women Tech Talk series. |
Keywords | Inclusive, product development, Google |
In Repository? | xxx |
Summary | At Google, they use 12 dimensions of diversity. She doesn’t go into what those are. There may be times when one dimension is more dominant in the discussion.
She emphasizes asking “who else”. Broaden your team’s thinking. Make sure that you start with equity: don’t just have an inclusive story, it really needs to be an inclusive product from the start. Tell about real people with real stories. 4 key points in the product design process process that they focus on for inclusion:
She makes it clear that the business case is strong for inclusion. Who is using your product? Who benefits from it? What are the side-effects of building inclusively for one group? |
Cross-Ref | xxx |
See Also
|
Xxx
|
Summary by | Carol Dunn |
Template
[edit]Please copy & paste this template to start a new summary
[edit]A
[edit]Citation |
Title[edit] |
Full Reference | xxx |
Type | xxx |
Theme | xxx |
Keywords | xxx |
In Repository? | xxx |
Summary | What are the most important takeaways for this group? |
Cross-Ref | xxx |
See Also
|
Xxx
|
Summary by | Your name here |