VisualEditor/Stakeholders
Appearance
This page describes the various stakeholders in the VisualEditor team's work. It aims to describe reality rather than goals.
- Divide pigs and chickens?
Group | Description | Needs | Key voice | Input channels |
---|---|---|---|---|
Readers | Read Wikipedia, sporadically or heavily, but have never clicked the 'edit' button |
|
Abbey Ripstra, Dan, and (during launch prep) Aaron from the research team. | ? |
New editors | Have made only a handful of edits, or have clicked the 'edit' button but been discouraged | VisualEditor is easy to use, and pushes users to behaviors favored by the community (adding useful citations, edit summaries, wikilinks, etc.) | Abbey, Dan, and (during launch prep) Aaron from the research team. | Dashboard. |
Casual editors | Edit sporadically (5-99 edits a month), and have a moderate understanding of the project and community | VisualEditor works well as a main editor for a content contributor, and does not try to be overly helpful (not like e.g. Clippy) | Abbey, Dan, and (during launch prep) Aaron from the research team. | Dashboard. |
Sherry Snyder and Erica Litrenta from Community Engagement. | Phabricator tasks, weekly meetings. | |||
Power editors | Edit heavily (99+ edits a month), have a broad understanding of the project, and heavily identify as community members |
|
Sherry and Erica from Community Engagement. | Phabricator tasks, weekly meetings. |
Self-selected power editors | Phabricator tasks, MediaWiki wiki (e.g. VisualEditor/Feedback), public triage meetings (though not in practice) | |||
Donors | Mostly individuals giving through the website, which overlaps heavily with editors and readers. |
|
Communications team. Caitlin Virtue on Advancement. | Nothing direct. Temporarily, VE launch meetings. |
Volunteer developers | Non-WMF developers who contribute to VE or related tools, or want to. | Input into decision-making process. Visibility into current changes. | Quim Gil. Self-selected members (e.g. TheDJ, EranRoz) | IRC. Mailing lists. Phabricator. RfCs? |
Group | Needs | Key voice | Input channels |
---|---|---|---|
Research team | Advance notice of project direction. Involvement in product discussions. | Dario, Abbey, Aaron | Weekly meeting. |
Non-team engineers | Notice of breaking changes that might affect them. | Jon Robson. | IRC. Mailing lists. Scrum of Scrums. |
Parsoid team. | Subbu Shastry. | ||
Operations | Notification (automated?) of any chance that impacts performance. | TBD. | Scrum of Scrums. |
Release engineering. | Zeljko. | ||
Analytics | Kevin LeDuc. Dan Andreescu. | ||
Community liasons | Advance notice of project direction. Immediate notice of breaking/disruptive changes. Input into prioritization of tasks. | Sherry, Erica, and Rachel. | Standups. Weekly meetings. Monthly product check-in. |
Communications | Advance notice of any changes likely to make news. | Katherine, Juliet. | TBD. |
Senior management | Input in earliest stages of goal-setting. Regular updates on progress. After-action data and analysis. | Lila and Damon. | Quarterly review meetings. |
Group | Needs | Key voice | |
---|---|---|---|
Designers | Early involvement in brainstorming. Clear backlog of tasks. | Nirzar. Kaity | Standups. Phabricator. |
Engineers | Clearly spec'ed, prioritized backlog of tasks. | Ed. | Standups. Phabricator. |
Productizers | Visibility into all other stakeholders. Final say on roadmap. | James. | |
QAers | Unified backlog of testing. Involvement in deploy process. | Rummana. |