This page describes the various stakeholders in the VisualEditor team's work. It aims to describe reality rather than goals.
- Divide pigs and chickens?
Community and public stakeholders (see Wikimedia Product Development/PersonĂŚ)
| Group
|
Description
|
Needs
|
Key voice
|
Input channels
|
| Readers
|
Read Wikipedia, sporadically or heavily, but have never clicked the 'edit' button
|
- Editing tools do not adversely affect the reading experience
- Aware of the opportunity to become an editor
|
Abbey Ripstra, Dan, and (during launch prep) Aaron from the research team.
|
?
|
| New editors
|
Have made only a handful of edits, or have clicked the 'edit' button but been discouraged
|
VisualEditor is easy to use, and pushes users to behaviors favored by the community (adding useful citations, edit summaries, wikilinks, etc.)
|
Abbey, Dan, and (during launch prep) Aaron from the research team.
|
Dashboard.
|
| Casual editors
|
Edit sporadically (5-99 edits a month), and have a moderate understanding of the project and community
|
VisualEditor works well as a main editor for a content contributor, and does not try to be overly helpful (not like e.g. Clippy)
|
Abbey, Dan, and (during launch prep) Aaron from the research team.
|
Dashboard.
|
| Sherry Snyder and Erica Litrenta from Community Engagement.
|
Phabricator tasks, weekly meetings.
|
| Power editors
|
Edit heavily (99+ edits a month), have a broad understanding of the project, and heavily identify as community members
|
- WikiEditor continues to work well
- VisualEditor is useful for use cases that WikiEditor does not cover well (e.g. table editing, auto citations, etc.)
|
Sherry and Erica from Community Engagement.
|
Phabricator tasks, weekly meetings.
|
| Self-selected power editors
|
Phabricator tasks, MediaWiki wiki (e.g. VisualEditor/Feedback), public triage meetings (though not in practice)
|
| Donors
|
Mostly individuals giving through the website, which overlaps heavily with editors and readers.
|
- Large donors want input into product prioritization.
- Want consistent public-facing updates
|
Communications team. Caitlin Virtue on Advancement.
|
Nothing direct. Temporarily, VE launch meetings.
|
| Volunteer developers
|
Non-WMF developers who contribute to VE or related tools, or want to.
|
Input into decision-making process. Visibility into current changes.
|
Quim Gil. Self-selected members (e.g. TheDJ, EranRoz)
|
IRC. Mailing lists. Phabricator. RfCs?
|
Foundation stakeholders
| Group
|
Needs
|
Key voice
|
Input channels
|
| Research team
|
Advance notice of project direction. Involvement in product discussions.
|
Dario, Abbey, Aaron
|
Weekly meeting.
|
| Non-team engineers
|
Notice of breaking changes that might affect them.
|
Jon Robson.
|
IRC. Mailing lists. Scrum of Scrums.
|
| Parsoid team.
|
|
Subbu Shastry.
|
|
| Operations
|
Notification (automated?) of any chance that impacts performance.
|
TBD.
|
Scrum of Scrums.
|
| Release engineering.
|
|
Zeljko.
|
|
| Analytics
|
|
Kevin LeDuc. Dan Andreescu.
|
|
| Community liasons
|
Advance notice of project direction. Immediate notice of breaking/disruptive changes. Input into prioritization of tasks.
|
Sherry, Erica, and Rachel.
|
Standups. Weekly meetings. Monthly product check-in.
|
| Communications
|
Advance notice of any changes likely to make news.
|
Katherine, Juliet.
|
TBD.
|
| Senior management
|
Input in earliest stages of goal-setting. Regular updates on progress. After-action data and analysis.
|
Lila and Damon.
|
Quarterly review meetings.
|
Team stakeholders
| Group
|
Needs
|
Key voice
|
|
| Designers
|
Early involvement in brainstorming. Clear backlog of tasks.
|
Nirzar. Kaity
|
Standups. Phabricator.
|
| Engineers
|
Clearly spec'ed, prioritized backlog of tasks.
|
Ed.
|
Standups. Phabricator.
|
| Productizers
|
Visibility into all other stakeholders. Final say on roadmap.
|
James.
|
|
| QAers
|
Unified backlog of testing. Involvement in deploy process.
|
Rummana.
|
|
