User:Pavithraes/Sandbox/Technical writer guide
This page has been merged to Documentation/Technical writer guide |
This is a community help guide. We encourage you to add more helpful references for technical documentarians. |
Overview
[edit]Effective technical documentation is a product of effective planning, production and presentation. Some useful notes and resources have been included in this page to support technical collaborators through each of these phases.
Technical writing process
[edit]- Create a document plan. Clearly define the following:
- Audience: Who is this information/document intended for? What is their skill level? Who else will read the document? Which community will the readers belong to?
- Purpose: Why is the topic relevant? What should be the outcome of reading the document?
- Context : What is the broader scope of the topic? Where will the document be published? How is the environment of the platform? What is the theme/mood of other related documentation on the platform?
- Document type: What is the best way to communicate the information? Which document genre will suit my purpose, audience and context the best? Refer to technical documentation templates and suggestions.
- Create a draft
- Collect relevant content and record the sources for citations.
- Structure the content based on the 'document genre' and include transitions wherever necessary.
- Give the document an appropriate title. Keep the title simple and searchable. Note to use sentence case for the document title and section headings.
- Follow the language guidelines and write for translation.
- Review: Ask the community and non-community members for feedback on the draft. Consider the suggestions and make necessary changes. It is good practice to check for biases and information gaps in this phase. See #Communication.
- Publish the document after verifying the final document against the #Checklist.
- Maintain the document: Technical documentation is never complete, it requires constant updates and maintenance. Take ownership of the document and revise it regularly.
Content collection
[edit]Documentation users care more about the quality of documentation than the quantity of information, and the quality of documentation directly depends on the quality of content. Here are a few pointers:
- It is commonly advised to start, and not end with Wikipedia.
- Going through similar technical documentation of other open-source projects can help understand the type of content needed.
- Besides websites, books, articles and research papers are good reference materials.
- Make sure to refer to MediaWiki/Wikitech/etc. pages to avoid content duplication and to collect useful references.
- Sometimes the related codebase and phabricator tasks are also good places to find recent information.
- For project specific information, you can communicate with the developers over IRC, mailing lists, Phabricator, Zulip, etc.
Communication
[edit]At a place like MediaWiki, where anyone can edit, effective communication is especially important for sucessful collaborations.
Collaborators interact on the talk pages, Phabricator tasks, sometimes on Gerrit (code-review), mailing-lists and additional group chats like IRC, Zulip, Slack, etc. The following are some points to note while interacting with the Wikimedia community:
- Follow Wikimedia's Code of conduct strictly.
- Use simple language and a friendly, yet professional tone at all times.
- Be mindful of the previous work done on a project and it's documentation.
- Understand that a new contributor may work on a project in the future and include all necessary remarks and references in the talk page.
Checklist
[edit]A list of items to review your documentation against before publishing.
- Verify if your document follows MediaWiki's documentation style guidelines:
- Check your content for any:
- biases in writing.
- gaps in the information.
- Make sure your document is easy to translate.
- Check if all the applicable categories are listed.
Common mistakes
[edit]Structure
[edit]- Failing to include an 'Overview section' on wiki pages.
- Using title case, instead of sentence case for headers.
- Inconsistent fonts throughout the document.
Language
[edit]- Using long and complex sentences.
- Using unecessary jargons.
- Not using an imperative mood.
Grammar
[edit]- Misplaced commas.
- Incorrect use of its and it's.
Resources
[edit]Technical writing
[edit]- What is technical writing
- Technical writing specifications
- Write the docs - Beginner's guide to docs
- Technical style