@Network-charles: I think what happened is that your changes would have had to be marked for translation. It would probably make more sense to use Extension:LabeledSectionTransclusion (but you have to use manual section tags rather than the lsth parser function because of more translation issues) rather than onlyinclude tags though.
They would also have to be marked for translation, but the failure mode would be no output at all, not transcluding the entire page.
Oh! I see. Would it be preferable to add the onlyinclude tags and wait for it to be marked, and then properly add the transcluded section in the Help:Recent changes page?
I would prefer the use of LabeledSectionTransclusion over onlyinclude tags, but yes, that should work.
Okay, I would love to try LabeledSectionTransclusion but I'm not sure how I'll use it since the extension will be installed locally on my machine and not publicly.
LabeledSectionTransclusion is installed on most Wikimedia wikis, including this one, already.
I noticed you have just transcluded the section at Special:Diff/prev/6503843, thank you. Also, thanks for the feedback.
