Thanks for taking up this difficult task. I imagine for most routine work, this will work fairly smoothly. So, I am going to think about a few edge cases.
- The one-week deadline for the decision making forum seems tight in some scenarios. But, I suppose it depends on what "feedback" means here. Is there / should there be a mechanism to ask for more time?
- I am expecting / assuming that most actors / decision teams will act in good faith on receiving critical / negative feedback from some section of stakeholders. But, how (or where in the process) are conflicts (as in technical directions that elicit potentially opposing / divergent views in the extreme) going to be resolved?
- How are rollbacks of decisions handled where they might become necessary? Is that a fresh proposal?
Relatedly, I assume that this process is open to being refined in the future based on actual working experience with it?