I was wondering how this edit got through filter 57, but I am guessing that reverting an edit is not one of the editing actions that the abuse filter tracks--is that the case? If so, is it possible to include revert?
Topic on Extension talk:AbuseFilter/Rules format
Appearance
It has nothing to do with reverts. The edit didn't trigger the filter because the filter only applies to root user pages, not user subpages.
Ah, thank you---I missed the "/"! :)