I think the review section mixes 2 things - ORES reviewing TCG, and TCG reviewing ORES, so to speak - but all in all, it should work. The tables instead... not entirely sure what I am looking at there. Let's say that getting here from Phab, Q review slides etc. doesn't help me find a recap of findings, and I actually know what I am looking for. Not sure what a PM could get out of this :)
Topic on Talk:Technical Collaboration Guidance/Cases/ORES
Yes, it is a mutual review. I'm glad that came across as its intent.
The table is a work-in-progress. Hopefully it will make more sense in the future as I work some other things out in the use-case process.