Jump to content

Topic on Template talk:ExtensionLicense

Ricordisamoa (talkcontribs)
Nemo bis (talkcontribs)

SPDX is already recommended in Manual:Coding_conventions#Licenses, so you can certainly go ahead and implement it. However, the issue is with hundreds of extension pages using unrecognised values: are you able to fix those as well?

Ricordisamoa (talkcontribs)

I went bold and implemented my proposal, then requested the bot flag to fix extension pages.

Be..anyone (talkcontribs)

They have WTFPL (version 2, adding 1 was rejected as not relevant), not bad. Sadly not directly helpful for commons (no FAL), and they're still trying to figure out Unicode licenses. Nice list, use it.

Reply to "SPDX names"