Team Practices Group/CSAT/Results
 | This page is obsolete. It is being retained for archival purposes. It may document extensions or features that are obsolete and/or no longer supported. Do not rely on the information here being up-to-date. |
Q3 FY1516
[edit]- Positively impacting value delivered by supported teams: 4.00 out of 5 (Likert scale)
- Positively impacting sustainability of supported teams: 4.38 out of 5 (Likert scale)
- NPS Score : 72
The following are key themes from answers to open-ended questions from Q3. The numbers under the theme indicates the frequency of mentions per theme. High counts under a specific theme indicate customer interest in that theme.
Please note that these specific questions were only asked in Q3 in order to evaluate key aspects of new focus areas that we might want to track (in this case qualities associated with "coaching" and "empowered teams"). We may add other open-ended questions from time to time.
Open-ended question 1: What would you expect from a team coach?
| Team cohesion | Advice on process | Advice on Soft skills | Meeting Facilitation | Negative feedback | Unclassifiable | Overall vision |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | 18 | 15 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 |
Open-ended question 2: What qualities would you expect to see in an empowered team?
| Cohesion. trust, fun | Ability to make decisions | Positive communication | Self-motivating and accountability | Productive | Respect | Unclassifiable |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15 | 6 | 16 | 17 | 4 | 3 | 2 |
Q2 FY1516
[edit]- Positively impacting value delivered by supported teams: 4.13 out of 5 (Likert scale)
- Positively impacting sustainability of supported teams: 4.47 out of 5 (Likert scale)
- NPS Score : 55.6
Q1 FY1516
[edit]- Positively impacting value delivered by supported teams: 4.2 out of 5 (Likert scale)
- Positively impacting sustainability of supported teams: 4.6 out of 5 (Likert scale)
- NPS Score : 66.6
The following are open response themes from Q1. The numbers under the theme indicates the frequency of mentions per theme. High counts under a specific theme would indicate customer interest in that theme.
Please note that we only ran these in the first iteration (Q1). We may add other open answer questions from time to time.
Open Question 1: Is there anything else, not listed above, that your TPGer helps with?
| Experimentation | cross-team coordination | promoting best practices/Process details | running meetings | Makes decisions easier by adding a neutral voice | TPGer doens't try to solve issues we don't have | Facilitate Self-awarenes | Non-Agile Facilitation is good | TPGer makes it easier to collaborate | Coaching | Negative Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | 11 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
Open Question 2: What would you miss the most if a TGPer was no longer on your team?
| cross-team coordination | Positivity/energy | promoting best practices/Process details | neutral voice | TPGer is mirror for reflection | flexibility | TPGer keeps things calm | mentorship | coaching | keeps us focused | Running Meetings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | 10 | 16 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 10 | 4 |
Open Questions 3: Do you have any other comments about your TPGer's performance?
| what does TPG do outside of team? | TPGer helps us move as a unit | "+1" to mediation | Was skeptical, now a believer | Wants TPG to do more conventional project management | coordination is better | TPGer picks up the slack/spillover | Positive feedback on TPGer | negative comment | recommendation/requests |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 4 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 12 | 4 | 28 | 2 | 6 |
Q2 FY1617
[edit]- Number of respondents: 20
- NPS Score: 85
- Survey frequency is fine for 12 out of 20 respondents (60%)
- There are way too many surveys for 3 out of 20 respondents (15%)
- There are slightly too many surveys for 2 out of 20 respondents (10%)