Talk:Wikimedia Performance Team/Performance Review

Thanks for the recent performance review of versioned maps, it was thorough and helpful! We're wondering what the next steps should be, and it might be good to include an outline in this document. For example, once the review task is closed, I suppose it's up to the development team to address any identified issues, and there is no extra performance review of how that work concludes?

Thanks. Two thoughts when reading the current revision:

• Should their be a sentence that ask people to read and follow https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Performance_guidelines before requesting such a review?

• Is there a difference between "financial quarter" and "quarter"? (Asking from the PoV of a volunteer who has no idea about finance, or that it's currently an implicit reference to the financial planning of some unnamed organization.)

Good ideas for both suggestions, thanks!