Talk:Community metrics/2013-Q1
Add topicLatest comment: 11 years ago by Nemo bis
The format in subpagename is quite ugly. --Nemo 09:06, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
- Happy to improve it. Any suggestions?--Qgil (talk) 15:09, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
- Hard to say. At least reverse to make sortable, 2013-1Q. But maybe 2013-Q1 is more common, and on the other hand Q is four months in Italian. Why not just 2013-I, 2013-II etc.? Couldn't find anything usable in ISO norms. Or after all, why not "2013 1st quarter" etc., we're not running out of bytes. :) --Nemo 19:20, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
- The EU at least uses 2013-Q1 and 2013-H1 as a standard. Jdforrester (WMF) (talk) 19:39, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
- I'm surprised, I didn't answer to avoid saying idiocies but I wasn't too wrong. I'll rename it then, and we can move to more productive discussions. :) --Nemo 06:15, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
- The EU at least uses 2013-Q1 and 2013-H1 as a standard. Jdforrester (WMF) (talk) 19:39, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
- Hard to say. At least reverse to make sortable, 2013-1Q. But maybe 2013-Q1 is more common, and on the other hand Q is four months in Italian. Why not just 2013-I, 2013-II etc.? Couldn't find anything usable in ISO norms. Or after all, why not "2013 1st quarter" etc., we're not running out of bytes. :) --Nemo 19:20, 8 March 2013 (UTC)