Random ideas for rollback to be shelved and forgotten about
Appearance
Rollback is pretty damn contentious on certain wikis.
Assignments
[edit]Options:
- User group (given out by bureaucrats or admins)
- Automatic (via autoconfirmed or the newer AutoPromote)
- Given to everyone without a new user group
Limitations
[edit]Options:
- Rate limits
- Possible settings (10 per minute for non-admins)
- No UI for non-admins (require JS implementation)
Actual implementation
[edit]Options:
- Remove undo and give everyone some type of rollback
- Use JS (with non-JS fall back) to provide some sort of place to input a custom edit summary or leave default
- Have a user pref to force a rollback edit summary
- Use a &bot=1-esque feature to allow a custom summary on mass rollbacks for admins
- If having a UI, where to put (or not put) links
- History tab
- Special:Contributions
- Diff pages - essential
- Have checkboxes to do mass rollbacks (including the option to have a custom edit summary with them)
Splarka proposal
[edit]- On diff pages, two links:
- Auto rollback – the same rollback has always been (no configurable edit summary, immediate results)
- Manual rollback – manual interstitials for &Summary=
- Possible JS enhancement:
- Allow prompt() to essentially merge the two links into one
- Dialog pops up with the default edit summary in an input box; user choose to fill in a customize summary or click OK
- On Special:Contributions:
- Have a cascading edit summary similar to current &bot=1 option
- Something like &rollbacksummary=Foo_bar_bazz that modifies all the rollback links on the page
- Possible JS enhancement:
- Allow live modification of &Summary without a reload
- Slightly quicker and keeps behavior closer to older behavior
- On history tabs:
- Have two links, similar to diff pages
Or...
[edit]- Use $wgLockDb until the users fall in line