Project:Requests for permissions/User rights/Addihockey10
User:Addihockey10
[edit]- Requested user-rights: Administrator.
Hello, I am a counter-vandalism/spam contributor for the Wikimedia projects. I rollback vandalism/spam here and deal with disruptive accounts on a global level. I have accounts on most if not all WMF projects and assist on many of them. Thanks! --Addihockey10 (talk) 04:32, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
- As I told you on IRC, I believe that global sysop should be tried for first. That said, though, a developer should comment before a bureaucrat decides.--Jasper Deng (talk) 04:36, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
- Hello, I see only 2 edits from you, this year, one of them is this permission request. Are you sure you need the access to sysop tools on this wiki? I am happy that you help to deal with vandalism, but spam pages can be tagged by anyone so that current sysops can remove them. Just as vandalism can be reverted by anyone. Thanks Petrb (talk) 12:20, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
- Hi, as most of my contribs are deleted it will appear that I only have to edits this year. I should have many more in my deleted contributions. --Addihockey10 (talk) 18:59, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
- But that only makes 39 total, including this comment, which is why I believe global sysop is a better thing to try for.--Jasper Deng (talk) 19:21, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
- Global sysop requires you to be an admin on a content wiki first, which I don't believe Addihockey is. The Helpful One 12:19, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
- But that only makes 39 total, including this comment, which is why I believe global sysop is a better thing to try for.--Jasper Deng (talk) 19:21, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
- Hi, as most of my contribs are deleted it will appear that I only have to edits this year. I should have many more in my deleted contributions. --Addihockey10 (talk) 18:59, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
- Hello, I see only 2 edits from you, this year, one of them is this permission request. Are you sure you need the access to sysop tools on this wiki? I am happy that you help to deal with vandalism, but spam pages can be tagged by anyone so that current sysops can remove them. Just as vandalism can be reverted by anyone. Thanks Petrb (talk) 12:20, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
- I'm suggesting a
Not done per the lack of activity or need for the tools.--Jasper Deng (talk) 23:11, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
- Seconded, marking this as Not done. --Skizzerz 06:54, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
- Seconded, marking this as
