Project:Requests for permissions/Justman10000 4

The following discussion is closed and will soon be archived.

---

User: Justman10000

Requested user-rights: Bureaucrat.

• Justman10000 (talk • contribs • logs • rights • SUL utility)

I would like to provide bureaucratic support here. This includes granting/revoking permissions and deleting/protecting pages. I have been doing a lot of translation work, and I hope that this will be enough to convince enough people

I realise that this is quite a lot of permissions, but I would really be happy to get a chance! Perhaps one could at least go about it with temporary bureaucrat status

• Strong oppose. Translation admin work has been controversial, and user has not shown sufficient maturity to have rights over others. See original request, and response to subsequent opposition, and (recently changed) old user page post-rejection of a prior request. --Clump (talk) 21:12, 11 June 2024 (UTC)

  I don't quite understand what you're getting at! Nothing linked proves anything! And translation work is something completely different from administration! I have system administered around 20 Minecraft and FiveM networks! These were only tiny to small networks, but still... Justman10000 (talk) 14:30, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

  @Clump

  
  

  There? Justman10000 (talk) 13:14, 16 June 2024 (UTC)

  "There?"? Anyway, 1) if you do not understand why declaiming legitimate corrections to your edits, and making petulant responses may be interpreted as less than mature then I guess that's the essence of the problem; 2) no actual evidence of need for admin (let alone bureaucrat) rights has been been provided; 3) your non-translation edits seem to mainly focus on enforcing an arbitrary, personal style irrespective of the cost to translation or the technical irrelevance of the changes. Finally, 4) your assertion that "translation work is something completely different from administration" contradicts your initial statement that your translation work should somehow be a convincing justification for administration rights, and 5) your external experience in network administration isn't relevant. --Clump (talk) 17:09, 16 June 2024 (UTC)

• Do you want to be a bureaucrat or an admin? The type of stuff you want to do suggests that you're actually looking to be an admin - users are normally expected to be an admin before requesting bureaucrat (which mainly just gives the right to assign a few extra permissions). I'm as a result not inclined to support this request either. Leaderboard (talk) 07:37, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

  No, would love to be a bureaucrat! But if that's not possible, I would also be happy with administrator Justman10000 (talk) 08:18, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

• Oppose for now. The links in Clump's post are concerning. They show that you should probably focus on improving your translationadmin work before pursuing other permissions. They also show that you have a tendency to over-reply in discussions, which might bother other people and indicate some room for improvement in your interactions with others. Finally, it is unclear why you would want to be a bureaucrat without being an administrator, which hints that you may not understand those two permissions well. You do seem like a hard worker though, which is great, so hopefully you find this feedback useful and hopefully you stick around. –Novem Linguae (talk) 12:34, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
• Oppose per above. * Pppery * _{it has begun} 19:02, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

N Not done No support after a week. --DannyS712 (talk) 03:50, 19 June 2024 (UTC)