Extension talk:Adiutor/User acceptance testing/Feedback

Feedback from İmmortalance

Home wiki: tr:wiki

Q/A:

• Q1: Was the user interface easy to navigate and use for various tasks?
  • A1: Quite satisfactory

• Q2: Did you encounter any issues or bugs? If so, please provide details.
  • A2: No.

• Q3: Which features did you find most useful and why?
  • A3: Easy tags make me feel very comfortable..

• Q4: Do you have suggestions for additional features or improvements?
  • A4: Not yet.

• Q5: How well did the extension integrate with your existing Wikipedia workflow?
  • A5: It's more good than other altenatives.

• Q6: Would you recommend Adiutor to other editors?
  • A6: %100 yes.

İmmortalance (talk) 12:16, 26 December 2023 (UTC)

Feedback from Kurmanbek

Home wiki: tr:wiki

Q/A:

• Q1: Was the user interface easy to navigate and use for various tasks?
  • A1: Yes, the interface is so easy for navigate and use.

• Q2: Did you encounter any issues or bugs? If so, please provide details.
  • A2: No, I didn't see any bug or issue on the Adiutor.

• Q3: Which features did you find most useful and why?
  • A3: Page tagging feature is the most useful feature for me. Because on Turkish Wikipedia, I'm always using tags.

• Q4: Do you have suggestions for additional features or improvements?
  • A4: Maybe you can add copyright checker.

• Q5: How well did the extension integrate with your existing Wikipedia workflow?
  • A5: Fully.

• Q6: Would you recommend Adiutor to other editors?
  • A6: Exactly!

Kurmanbek (talk) 21:25, 26 December 2023 (UTC)

Feedback from Justinianus

Home wiki: tr:wiki

Q/A:

• Q1: Was the user interface easy to navigate and use for various tasks?
  • A1: I think that it's very easy to navigate between the various tasks and the tool is very useful. There was no problem from my side.

• Q2: Did you encounter any issues or bugs? If so, please provide details.
  • A2: I did not have any issues or bugs when I use.

• Q3: Which features did you find most useful and why?
  • A3: The tagging task which I use very often is very helpful when I use it.

• Q4: Do you have suggestions for additional features or improvements?
  • A4: There is nothing I can suggest at this point.

• Q5: How well did the extension integrate with your existing Wikipedia workflow?
  • A5: It seems perfectly in my using.

• Q6: Would you recommend Adiutor to other editors?
  • A6: Absolutely!

Justinianus (talk) 13:14, 27 December 2023 (UTC)

Feedback from Vikiolog

Home wiki: tr:wiki

Q/A:

• Q1: Was the user interface easy to navigate and use for various tasks?
  • A1: It was easy to use and has user friendly interface

• Q2: Did you encounter any issues or bugs? If so, please provide details.
  • A2: No

• Q3: Which features did you find most useful and why?
  • A3: Tagging pages. Comparing to searching from all templates to find tags, this is easier since it has tag related only.

• Q4: Do you have suggestions for additional features or improvements?
  • A4: Nothing yet i can recall.

• Q5: How well did the extension integrate with your existing Wikipedia workflow?
  • A5: Pretty much.

• Q6: Would you recommend Adiutor to other editors?
  • A6: Definitely, especially to the patrollers.

Vikiolog (talk) 18:18, 27 December 2023 (UTC)

Feedback from Adem

Home wiki: tr:wiki

Q/A:

• Q1: Was the user interface easy to navigate and use for various tasks?
  • A1: Very easy

• Q2: Did you encounter any issues or bugs? If so, please provide details.
  • A2: Nope

• Q3: Which features did you find most useful and why?
  • A3: Speedy Deletion

• Q4: Do you have suggestions for additional features or improvements?
  • A4: No

• Q5: How well did the extension integrate with your existing Wikipedia workflow?
  • A5: -

• Q6: Would you recommend Adiutor to other editors?
  • A6:Yes of course

Adem (talk) 14:59, 28 December 2023 (UTC)

Feedback from Basak

Home wiki: tr:wiki

Q/A:

• Q1: Was the user interface easy to navigate and use for various tasks?
  • A1: Yes, it was easy.

• Q2: Did you encounter any issues or bugs? If so, please provide details.
  • A2: No, i didn't have any issue.

• Q3: Which features did you find most useful and why?
  • A3: No need no know wiki -format. That's great because this would democratise the functioning of wiki projects as the power to tag articles, proposing deletions etc. does not remain at the hands of very few people who have relaively more wiki format skills.

• Q4: Do you have suggestions for additional features or improvements?
  • A4: It's important to make a very good and clear explanation about the wiki policies (deletion policy, etc) easily reachable as the user uses the tool. Adding "Are you sure you want to complete this?" type of question might be good.

• Q5: How well did the extension integrate with your existing Wikipedia workflow?
  • A5:Normally, i am not vey much involved in tasks like proposing articles for deletion. But i might be involved more as Adiutor makes it easier.

• Q6: Would you recommend Adiutor to other editors?
  • A6: Yes.

Basak (talk) 13:38, 31 December 2023 (UTC)

Feedback from Seksen iki yüz kırk beş

Home wiki: tr.wiki

Q/A:

• Q1: Was the user interface easy to navigate and use for various tasks?
  • A1: Yes, very intuitive interface.

• Q2: Did you encounter any issues or bugs? If so, please provide details.
  • A2: Not on the test wiki.

• Q3: Which features did you find most useful and why?
  • A3: Pretty much all of them!

• Q4: Do you have suggestions for additional features or improvements?
  • A4: I was unable to see an XfD closer feature on the test wiki. I am sure this will be part of the package eventually, and it has made my life as an admin much easier on tr.wiki. It would also be useful to have some feedback and/or notification and an option to opt out when it is notifying the relevant user (a la Twinkle).

• Q5: How well did the extension integrate with your existing Wikipedia workflow?
  • A5: A beta version is currently available on tr.wiki and as discussed this has been an integral part of my workflow with regards to XfD closures. I would likely prefer Aduitor's functionality and sleek userface over other scripts I am currently using for other functionalities e.g. PRODs.

• Q6: Would you recommend Adiutor to other editors?
  • A6: I very much would.

Seksen iki yüz kırk beş (talk) 00:37, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

Feedback from Dr. Coal

Home wiki:

Q/A:

• Q1: Was the user interface easy to navigate and use for various tasks?
  • A1: Somewhat - but that's because I'm not accustomed to Vector (2022) skin. I will get used to.

• Q2: Did you encounter any issues or bugs? If so, please provide details.
  • A2: Negative.

• Q3: Which features did you find most useful and why?
  • A3: All of them, since I use them everyday on tr.wiki.

• Q4: Do you have suggestions for additional features or improvements?
  • A4: Not at the moment.

• Q5: How well did the extension integrate with your existing Wikipedia workflow?
  • A5: Quite well.

• Q6: Would you recommend Adiutor to other editors?
  • A6: Positive.

Dr. Coal (talk) 13:54, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

Feedback from Toghrul R

Home wiki: azwiki

Q/A:

• Q1: Was the user interface easy to navigate and use for various tasks?
  • A1: Very slick and user-friendly, unlike the similar solutions so far.

• Q2: Did you encounter any issues or bugs? If so, please provide details.
  • A2: I haven't encountered any of them. All modules work as they should.

• Q3: Which features did you find most useful and why?
  • A3: All of the features I tested are crucial.

• Q4: Do you have suggestions for additional features or improvements?
  • A4: Few things to add: It would be great too add the ability to find the present tags on the page, which could help to un-tag the page by detecting them via the extension. Or detecting multiple tag templates to group them together inside multiple issues templates. Other than these, a module to de-link whatlinkshere pages would be cool too.

• Q5: How well did the extension integrate with your existing Wikipedia workflow?
  • A5: It seems like the extension has been a part of MediaWiki. The design system (Codex) fits greatly with the wiki environment. Also, automation of the everyday tasks makes us feel like this extension should've always been available for everyone.

• Q6: Would you recommend Adiutor to other editors?
  • A6: Without a doubt. We'll open a discussion on deploying the extension for azwiki as soon as it's done.

Good luck to the developer/maintainer! Toghrul R (talk) 12:44, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

Feedback from MCGAMER YOUTUBE

Home wiki: simple:wiki

Q/A:

• Q1: Was the user interface easy to navigate and use for various tasks?
  • A1: yes

• Q2: Did you encounter any issues or bugs? If so, please provide details.
  • A2: guis seem to be scaled strangely on the monobook skin on a chromium based browseer, specifically 121 and on a gecko based browser, specifically firefox 115.5 esr on a 1600x900 screen

• Q3: Which features did you find most useful and why?
  • A3: the page move feature allowed for quick requests for page moves

• Q4: Do you have suggestions for additional features or improvements?
  • A4: a nice improvement would be to make the plugin's design change with what skin the user uses

• Q5: How well did the extension integrate with your existing Wikipedia workflow?
  • A5: worked well

• Q6: Would you recommend Adiutor to other editors?
  • A6: yes

MCGAMER YOUTUBE (talk) 03:48, 23 February 2024 (UTC)