Wikimedia Research/Design Research/Contributors Team UX Research/2016.12 New Wikitext Editor and Save/Publish
Appearance
New Wikitext Editor and Save/Publish
Daisy Chen
Abstract/Background
[edit]The new wikitext editor (NWTE) was developed to create a more seamless and consistent visual transition between the current wikitext editor (WTE) and visual editor (VE). The creation of NWE had 3 main goals:
- Create a more seamless and consistent visual transition between WTE and VE
- Reduce cognitive load on newer editors who started editing with VE and happen upon NWTE
- Retain all WTE functionality so current users do not experience feature loss
- Allow newer editors who start editing with NWTE to have access to rich-text controls in a familiar editing interface, while being able to utilize the wider editing functionalities possible with using wikitext mode
Research Questions
[edit]- How do both newer and experienced editors feel about the NWTE experience?
- Can all participants complete common editing tasks (edit text, format text, add links, add citations, save edits) correctly in NWTE without significant confusion or hardship?
- Are editing actions and switching between NWTE and VE intuitive?
- Do editors have any feedback if this editing set-up were to be live? Are there any essential elements editors feel are missing or existing elements that could be improved?
- Further regarding switching editors; did users notice cursor positioning on pages while switching, and how do they react in regard to whether their edits are preserved or not?
- How do users feel about the link inspector functionality?
- Do editors tend to default towards VE controls or WTE âcodeâ to perform editing tasks?
- What do âSave Changesâ and âPublish Changesâ mean to users in the wiki context?
Methodology
[edit]- Participant recruiting
- 5 participants
- Youtube Live / Google Hangout on Air sessions
- http://visualeditor-test.wmflabs.org (test environment)
Participants
[edit]Existing Wikipedia editors; ideally active new editors who primarily use VE.
Protocol
[edit]Covering the following topics:
- Add/edit/remove text
- Add/remove bold
- Add link
- Save an edit
- Add citation
- Switch editors (if the user is guided to the control; adding user on-boarding for this feature will follow)
Keep in mind that you are working with a test Wiki and can experience bugs, slower processing, etc. If at any point you feel like a task is too difficult to complete, please say so and move on to the next task.
- Letâs imagine that youâre an expert on wombats, and thought youâd make some improvements to the wombat Wikipedia page today. Even though you may typically use visual editor, weâll be working with another editor today. Tell us what, if anything, youâd expect to see after clicking on âEdit Sourceâ. Then, click on the button.
- Tell us your first impressions of this page youâre seeing.
- Go to the first paragraph on this page. Please make the word âVombatidaeâ (in the third sentence) bold.
- Now, at the end of the âCharacteristicsâ section, please add the sentence âA group of wombats is known as a wisdom.â, then move on to the next task.
- Itâs ideal when Wikipedia edits are supported with citations. Please show how you would cite that sentence you added in the last task with this reference URL: http://www.nationalgeographic.com.au/animals/wombat.aspx
- Near the bottom of the page, youâll find the âExternal linksâ section. Please add this link (http://www.parks.tas.gov.au/?base=4898) and make its display text âMore information on Wombatsâ.
- Letâs say that at this point youâd like to switch back to visual editor. Take 1-2 minutes to show how youâd switch editing modes, and talk through your thought process.
- If you figured it out, now try switching back into source editor. If you didnât figure it out, try and poke around a little more. Regardless of which editor youâre in after you poke around, move on to the next task!
- Youâre done editing for the day. Show us what you would do next to wrap up your editing session, and make sure to describe what youâre doing and your thoughts on the process.
Questions
- What did you think of your experience editing Wikipedia today?
- How did the âEdit Sourceâ screen compare with your expectations of what it would look like?
- Typically, editors click the âSave changesâ button to finalize their edits. What would you think if the button said âPublish changesâ instead? In your own words, describe your understandings and impressions of the phrase âSave changesâ versus âPublish changesâ. Which would you prefer?